<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IndieSongwriter.net &#187; key change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/category/key-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk</link>
	<description>Ideas and Advice for Songwriters (formerly songwright.co.uk)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stealing Ideas from Radiohead&#8217;s Creep</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/18/stealing-ideas-from-radioheads-creep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/18/stealing-ideas-from-radioheads-creep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Songwriting Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealing ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last post I mentioned some common chromatic chords. Over the weekend I also got involved in a very silly debate about the comparative &#8216;cultural significance&#8217; of Radiohead and Aqua. It involved the sort of long pretentious discussion I was thankful to have left behind in my student days, and I should probably be ashamed of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last post I mentioned some <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/16/chromatic-chords-a-few-options/">common chromatic chords</a>.</p>
<p>Over the weekend I also <a href="http://www.wellwrite.co.uk/?p=76">got involved </a>in a very<a href="http://newmusicstrategies.com/2008/02/13/fake-plastic-barbie/"> silly debate </a>about the comparative &#8216;cultural significance&#8217; of <a href="http://ridinghoodmusic.com/aqua-vs-radiohead/">Radiohead and Aqua</a>. It involved the sort of long pretentious discussion I was thankful to have left behind in my student days, and I should probably be ashamed of myself, but it was fun.</p>
<p>And it also made me think of that overplayed early Radiohead hit &#8216;Creep&#8217;.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5hL6Iz5L-54&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5hL6Iz5L-54&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>The chord progression in this song is worth a look because it uses two chromatic chords I mentioned before. The song is in the key of G, and starts of with a G major chord. There then follows a B Major chord.</p>
<p>Is B major in G major? No it isn&#8217;t, it requires a D sharp that you don&#8217;t find in the key. So it&#8217;s a chromatic chord &#8211; the third chord of the scale only major when it &#8216;should&#8217; be minor.</p>
<p>After that we get chord IV, C major. Which is in key, but the next chord isn&#8217;t because it&#8217;s C minor. Chord IV only minor.</p>
<p>So G B C Cminor. The B and C minor chords are chromatic. If you turn it into a C major version you also get the first chords to the verse of <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/08/21/episode-5-stealing-ideas-from-david-bowie-part-two/">Space Oddity </a>C E F Fm. Isn&#8217;t that interesting?</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t be afraid of stealing those ideas, definitely nothing new about them.</p>
<p>I promise I&#8217;ll stop talking about Radiohead sometime soon.</p>
<p><strong>If you enjoyed this post, why not <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Songwright">subscribe</a>?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/18/stealing-ideas-from-radioheads-creep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chromatic chords &#8211; A few options</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/16/chromatic-chords-a-few-options/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/16/chromatic-chords-a-few-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Songwriting Structure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[chromatic adj. Relating to colours or colour Chord choice can be a tricky thing for songwriters. It&#8217;s often a balance between the desire to be musically interesting and the need to not confuse the listener with too outlandish a change. Thankfully, the modern listener is actually pretty sophisticated. After all, western audiences have had about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.wellwrite.co.uk/songwright/poppies.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em><span><strong>chromatic</strong> adj. Relating to colours or colour</span> </em></p>
<p>Chord choice can be a tricky thing for songwriters. It&#8217;s often a balance between the desire to be musically interesting and the need to not confuse the listener with too outlandish a change.</p>
<p>Thankfully, the modern listener is actually pretty sophisticated. After all, western audiences have had about three hundred years to get used to chords I IV and V in the major key, and  just as long to get used to the modal harmonies from folk and all sorts of other harmonic ideas.</p>
<p><strong>Making a choice</strong></p>
<p>If there are all these different chord ideas to choose from, where do you start?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/29/songwriting-is-about-solving-problems/">linked to Jeremy Yew&#8217;s blog</a> before, but now I shall <a href="http://jeremyyew.com/2008/01/29/songwriting-resolution-non-family-chords/">do so again.</a> Late last month he wrote an <a href="http://jeremyyew.com/2008/01/29/songwriting-resolution-non-family-chords/">interesting post</a> about the &#8216;non-family&#8217;chords he&#8217;s trying to incorporate into his songwriting.</p>
<p>By non-family, he means chromatic chords ie. chords that don&#8217;t occur in a given scale. For example, in the key of C major you can&#8217;t get an E major chord, because E major needs a G sharp and there&#8217;s no G sharp in C major.</p>
<p>Does that mean that you can&#8217;t have an E major chord in a C major song? Of course not, it&#8217;s actually a very common chord in that key and there are countless songs that use it. The first two chords of the verse Bowie&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gothamcityinsider.com/2007/10/is-major-tom-still-alive.html">Space Oddity</a> is one example (which I&#8217;<a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/08/21/episode-5-stealing-ideas-from-david-bowie-part-two/">ve talked about before</a>) .</p>
<p>There are several common chromatic chords that Jeremy, and any other songwriter, might want to try.</p>
<p><strong>1. The Secondary Dominant</strong></p>
<p><em>(There seems to be more than one idea about <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/secondary-dominant">what this term means</a>, possibly because of the differences between European and American musical terms.)</em></p>
<p>In C major, the dominant chord is G. Why? Because it is a fifth above the root chord and has a very clear &#8216;gravity&#8217; and sounds like it has to &#8216;come home&#8217; to the C. The tension between root and dominant has been the basis of literally thousands of pieces of Western music.</p>
<p>The secondary dominant is the chord you find if you take the same idea a step further. G is the dominant of C, but what is the dominant of G? It&#8217;s D. So going from a D to a G and then to a C sounds good, even though D isn&#8217;t in the key of C.</p>
<p>How do you find the secondary dominant in a scale if you&#8217;re not too good on music theory? Just turn the second chord in the scale into a major chord. So in C, instead of D minor, play D major, then G, then C.</p>
<p>In the key of F it would be G, C, F.</p>
<p><strong>2. The Flattened Seventh</strong></p>
<p>In the normal major scale, the seventh chord is diminished, and in pop music it&#8217;s rarely used. A common chromatic alternative is found by flattening the seventh note and building a major chord on that. A bluesy sounding chord choice.</p>
<p>In C major? Play a Bb chord.</p>
<p><strong>3. The Minor Fourth</strong></p>
<p>Exactly as the name implies, take the fourth chord and turn it minor.</p>
<p>In C major? Play an F minor chord.</p>
<p>If you can bare it, listen to this example (the first two chords in the verse):</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QTahrYXCChI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QTahrYXCChI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>In summary</strong></p>
<p>There are lots of other alternatives. There&#8217;s also a lot more that could be said about each of these examples, for example about the use of secondary dominants in jazz or the <a href="http://roymitchellcardenas.blogspot.com/2007/08/mixolydian-mode.html">modal implications of the flattened seventh.</a></p>
<p>The main point though, is that there are plenty of chromatic or &#8216;non-family&#8217; chords you can try out to bring a little extra colour to your songwriting. The key is too try things out and find something that works for you.</p>
<p><strong>if you enjoyed this post, why not <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Songwright">subscribe</a>?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/02/16/chromatic-chords-a-few-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stealing Ideas from Madness &#8211; House of Fun</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/28/stealing-ideas-from-madness-house-of-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/28/stealing-ideas-from-madness-house-of-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form in songwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Songwriting Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealing ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House of Fun is a breezy, quirky, cheersome little pop song by Madness. It has an up-tempo ska groove to it and a video that steals liberally from Monty Python sketches. It&#8217;s great fun, but this is Songwright so the important question is: are there any songwriting ideas we can steal from this song? Of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-QnBccG_ChI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-QnBccG_ChI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>House of Fun is a breezy, quirky, cheersome little pop song by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madness_(band)">Madness</a>. It has an up-tempo ska groove to it and a video that steals liberally from Monty Python sketches.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great fun, but this is Songwright so the important question is: are there any songwriting ideas we can steal from this song?</p>
<p>Of course there are! And in particular House of Fun includes a fantastic idea for <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/category/key-change/">changing key.</a></p>
<p><strong>1. The structure</strong></p>
<p>Intro, verse 1, verse 2, chorus, verse 3, chorus, middle section, verse 4, chorus to end.</p>
<p>That, in a nutshell is the stucture of &#8216;House of Fun&#8217;. Each section is very short, made even shorter by the tempo, and in between most sections the song returns to the opening groove of the  intro.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t a unique structure, it&#8217;s been used many times, and it works brilliantly. In particular it&#8217;s worth noting that the middle section (I&#8217;m sorry son, but we don&#8217;t stock&#8230;) is the only part of the song that breaks from the up-beat groove. Contrast is very important in songwriting and if there&#8217;s anyplace that contrast really needs to stand out it&#8217;s after the second chorus.</p>
<p><strong>2. The chord choices</strong></p>
<p>Or rather the order that they&#8217;re put in. In particular I want to point out the chords in the chorus.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because they&#8217;re different every time.</p>
<p>Chorus one: Em C Em Bm, F#m D  F#m C#m (which, as you&#8217;ll see is the same idea twice, but the second time it&#8217;s changed key and moved up a tone)</p>
<p>Chorus two:  F#m D  F#m C#m Em C</p>
<p>Chorus three is the big one, and it&#8217;s here that we find out the song has actually been building to one circular repeating chorus.  Em C Em Bm, then a tone up to F#m D  F#m C#m, then a tone down when it goes back to the beginning.</p>
<p>Yup, it&#8217;s changing key, and yup it&#8217;s doing so in exactly the same way that those cheesy boy band songs do. Except it&#8217;s doing it over and over again in a short space of time.</p>
<p><strong>Why?</strong></p>
<p>To stop things getting boring. By constantly changing key and changing back like this a manic, unresolved mood is developed, perfectly in keeping with the spirit of the song.</p>
<p>So there you go, ideas to take from House of Fun, and a new variation on this key changing idea that we&#8217;ve been talking about recently.</p>
<p><strong>If you enjoyed this post, <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Songwright">why not subscribe</a>?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/28/stealing-ideas-from-madness-house-of-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Changes &#8211; Part three: Stealing Ideas from Iron Maiden</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/14/key-changes-part-three-stealing-ideas-from-iron-maiden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/14/key-changes-part-three-stealing-ideas-from-iron-maiden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealing ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/key-changes-part-three-stealing-ideas-from-iron-maiden/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who says key changes are just for boy bands? Yes, I&#8217;m abandoning any hint of respectability I might have retained. I like cheesy heavy metal. Love it. And in this post we&#8217;re going to see a very different use the basic key change idea we talked about before. First a little background Last post I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Sam5omG0v0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Sam5omG0v0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Who says key changes are just for boy bands?</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m abandoning any hint of respectability I might have retained. I like cheesy heavy metal.  Love it. And in this post we&#8217;re going to see a very different use the basic key change idea <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/09/key-changes-%e2%80%93-part-two/">we talked about before.</a></p>
<p><strong>First a little background</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/13/new-on-the-blogroll/">Last post</a> I mentioned the interview I did with <a href="http://www.ductapeguy.net/">Sean McGhaughey.</a> During that interview, I talked about the dissertation I wrote when I was at Uni. It was about genre distinctions in Heavy Metal. (Don&#8217;t laugh)</p>
<p>This reminded me of Aces High by Iron Maiden,  a song that fits neatly into our little series on <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/category/key-change/">changing key.</a></p>
<p><strong>So many keys&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Iron Maiden songs are often built on the chord progression i VI VII in the aeolian mode. What does that mean? It means Em C D in the key of E minor. Or in the key of A minor Am F G. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll recognise it if you play it.</p>
<p>Just as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OKhMSauxD4">embarrassingly cheesy boy bands</a> can change key by taking the same progression and leaping into another key, so can heavy metal bands:</p>
<p><strong>Aces High</strong></p>
<p><strong>Intro: </strong>The aeolian i VI VII progression in F#.</p>
<p><strong>First riff: </strong>the same progression, but now in A. The guitar parts are different, but listen to the bass line and you&#8217;ll hear what I mean.</p>
<p><strong>Verse and Bridge</strong>: We don&#8217;t have the same progression here, but we have changed to E minor.</p>
<p><strong>Chorus:</strong> this is the fun part, the first half is the progression in E, then half way through it leaps up and plays the same thing in G.</p>
<p><strong>Break: </strong>A riff in A minor</p>
<p><strong>Solo:</strong> a similar chord progression, first in A, then B</p>
<p><strong>Break, Verse, Chorus, Main Riff again and we&#8217;re done.</strong></p>
<p>So by the end of the song you&#8217;ve gone through the aeolian mode in F#, E, G, A and B. And they managed it without a single longing gaze into the camera.</p>
<p>Who said key changes were just for boy bands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/14/key-changes-part-three-stealing-ideas-from-iron-maiden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Changes – Part Two</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/09/key-changes-%e2%80%93-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/09/key-changes-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealing ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/key-changes-%e2%80%93-part-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having established that changing key is a valid way of adding interest and contrast to a song, how might we achieve it? First a recap Last post-about-key-changes we reached a conclusion: Being ‘in C’ means two things. Only the notes from the C scale The C note as a ‘home’ or tonic note Which can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/">Having established</a> that changing key is a valid way of adding interest and contrast to a song, how might we achieve it?</p>
<p><b>First a recap</b></p>
<p>Last <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/">post-about-key-changes</a> we reached a conclusion:</p>
<p><a href="http://musiced.about.com/od/lessonsandtips/qt/keysignatures.htm">Being ‘in C’ means two things.</a></p>
<ul>
<li>Only the notes from the C scale</li>
<li>The C note as a ‘home’ or tonic note</li>
</ul>
<p>Which can be generalised as</p>
<p>Being in a key means two things:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using only the notes from that key</li>
<li>Using one of that group of notes as a &#8216;home&#8217; or tonic note</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Therefore&#8230; da da daaaaa!</b></p>
<p><span>To change key you can do one of these or both:</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Change the group of notes you&#8217;re using.</li>
<li><span>Change the note you&#8217;re 	using as a tonic note.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Got that?</b></p>
<p>The obvious next step would be to go straight to the kind of key change we are most used to, which is the cheesey up-a-tone boy band change.</p>
<p>So we will.</p>
<p>The chords in C major are: C Dm Em F G A m Bdim.</p>
<p>A tone up from this is D major, and the chords in D major are: D Em F#m G A Bm C#dim.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/09/19/episode-8-chords-and-numbers/">an old podcast episode of chord facts</a>, we can generalise the chords in the major scale as: I ii iii IV V vi VIIdim (lower case means minor).</p>
<p>So&#8230; if we had the chord progression   C G Am F, we could generalise and say that&#8217;s I V vi IV. So in D major we&#8217;d get D A Bm G.</p>
<p>Neatly, this changes both the group of notes you&#8217;re using (there are different notes in C Major and D Major) and the tonic note (from C to D). So one is higher pitched than the other, but both progressions sound the same apart from that.</p>
<p>Which means the same melody will fit if you play it a tone up.</p>
<p>For an example, do a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=westlife&amp;search=Search">youtube search for Westlife</a>. If you can bear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2008/01/09/key-changes-%e2%80%93-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Changes &#8211; Part One</title>
		<link>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chords and harmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomslatter.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first of several posts that will look at key changes. Key changes? I hear you wail, The cheesey bit in the final chorus of boy band ballads? I have no need of such cheap tricks! Well, no I don&#8217;t just mean that particular cliché, although a key change in the final chorus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first of several posts that will look at key changes.</p>
<p><em>Key changes?</em> I hear you wail, <em>The cheesey bit in the final chorus of boy band ballads? I have no need of such cheap tricks!</em></p>
<p>Well, no I don&#8217;t <em>just</em> mean that particular cliché, although a key change in the final chorus doesn&#8217;t have to be cheesy. What I mean is <em>all</em> the ways tonality can change in a song. That could mean the simple &#8216;everything up a major second&#8217; technique we&#8217;ve heard too many times in pop songs, but it could mean a &#8216;pitch of axis&#8217; change, a change of mode, or a whole host of other ideas.</p>
<p>Before we look at the idea in any detail, let&#8217;s finish this post by defining what a &#8216;key&#8217; is. I&#8217;m sure you know that being &#8216;in the key of C&#8217; means using only the natural notes and not the sharps or flats. but does it only mean that?</p>
<p>Not quite. Being &#8216;in C&#8217; also means having C as a home note, or &#8216;tonic&#8217;. The note C sounds consonant, or &#8216;home&#8217; and all the other notes in the scale, to varying degrees, sound at odds with that note.</p>
<p><em>What?</em>  you say. This idea of a &#8216;home&#8217; or tonic note is central to music in our part of the world. To illustrate, let&#8217;s look at the melody<em> Twinkle Twinkle Little Star.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>The first line goes: C C G G A A G F F E E D D C. It ends on a C, and therefore sounds finished. The second line: G G F F E E D G G F F E E D, ends on a D, which is not the tonic note. The second line therefore sound unfinished and it needs the first line repeating n order to bring the melody &#8216;home&#8217; to the tonic C.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, being &#8216;in C&#8217; means two things.</p>
<ul>
<li>Only the notes from the C scale</li>
<li>The C note as a &#8216;home&#8217; or tonic note</li>
</ul>
<p>If either changes, you have a change of key</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.songwright.co.uk/2007/12/13/key-changes-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

